Unlocking the Black Box: Analysing the EU Artificial Intelligence Act's Framework for Explainability in AI
Georgios Pavlidis

TL;DR
This paper examines the EU AI Act's framework for explainability, exploring approaches, challenges, and legal integration to promote transparent and accountable AI systems in critical sectors.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of XAI techniques, implementation challenges, and the legal and policy considerations within the EU AI governance framework.
Findings
Identifies key XAI techniques relevant to EU regulations
Highlights challenges in implementing explainability in practice
Discusses the role of standard setting and enforcement in EU law
Abstract
The lack of explainability of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is one of the first obstacles that the industry and regulators must overcome to mitigate the risks associated with the technology. The need for eXplainable AI (XAI) is evident in fields where accountability, ethics and fairness are critical, such as healthcare, credit scoring, policing and the criminal justice system. At the EU level, the notion of explainability is one of the fundamental principles that underpin the AI Act, though the exact XAI techniques and requirements are still to be determined and tested in practice. This paper explores various approaches and techniques that promise to advance XAI, as well as the challenges of implementing the principle of explainability in AI governance and policies. Finally, the paper examines the integration of XAI into EU law, emphasising the issues of standard setting, oversight, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
