iAgent: LLM Agent as a Shield between User and Recommender Systems
Wujiang Xu, Yunxiao Shi, Zujie Liang, Xuying Ning, Kai Mei, Kun Wang, Xi Zhu, Min Xu, Yongfeng Zhang

TL;DR
This paper proposes a novel paradigm where an LLM-based agent acts as a protective intermediary between users and recommender systems, aiming to enhance user control and mitigate issues like manipulation and lack of personalization.
Contribution
Introduction of a user-agent-platform paradigm with an LLM agent serving as a shield to improve user protection and personalization in recommender systems.
Findings
The proposed paradigm enhances user control over recommendations.
LLM agents can effectively shield users from platform biases.
The approach addresses vulnerabilities in traditional recommender systems.
Abstract
Traditional recommender systems usually take the user-platform paradigm, where users are directly exposed under the control of the platform's recommendation algorithms. However, the defect of recommendation algorithms may put users in very vulnerable positions under this paradigm. First, many sophisticated models are often designed with commercial objectives in mind, focusing on the platform's benefits, which may hinder their ability to protect and capture users' true interests. Second, these models are typically optimized using data from all users, which may overlook individual user's preferences. Due to these shortcomings, users may experience several disadvantages under the traditional user-platform direct exposure paradigm, such as lack of control over the recommender system, potential manipulation by the platform, echo chamber effects, or lack of personalization for less active…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2025
1. The paper is clearly written and easy to understand. The appendix includes extensive experimental details, allowing future researchers to easily follow and replicate the study. 2. Adopting LLMs for re-ranking is quite novel, as they can leverage world knowledge to enhance result interpretability and improve re-ranking accuracy.
1. The LLMs used in this paper are zero-shot without fine-tuning, which relies heavily prompt engineering. Additionally, all four datasets are based on user reviews. In other domain-specific scenarios where world knowledge is less relevant, these zero-shot LLMs may perform poorly. 2. Personalized re-ranking is quite common in modern recommender systems. For example, [1-3] proposed re-ranking models that adjust the initial ranking list based on user preferences. The authors should compare their L
* The authors' development of the INSTRUCTREC datasets, which incorporate user instructions alongside user-item interactions, provides a valuable new benchmark for evaluating recommendation agents. * The paper introduces two agent-based models, iAgent and i2Agent, that demonstrate strong performance improvements over state-of-the-art baselines.
* The generated dataset is relatively small, with each subset containing fewer than 100,000 entries. This may limit the robustness of the findings. As a result, traditional recommendation models may be trained in an underfit manner. In Table 4, some performance of traditional recommendation models resembles random guessing. * The paper does not compare its approach with existing LLM-based recommendation methods, such as TALLRec [1] and LLaRA [2]. * It is recommended to report token consumptio
1. The proposed agent-as-shield idea is interesting. 2. The paper is easy to understand. 3. The experiments in this paper are comprehensive.
1. The technical novelty of this paper is limited. Almost all the components (i.e., parser, reranker, memory, and self-reflection) in this paper are existing technologies [1, 2, 3]. The main novelty of this paper lies in the proposed concept of agent-as-shield, while this novelty is not reflected in the component design. The model design is not relevant to the agent-as-shield idea. It looks like a general agent framework, rather than agent-as-shield framework. 2. This paper lacks sufficient dis
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRecommender Systems and Techniques · Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation · AI in Service Interactions
