The life cycle of scientific principles -- a template for characterizing physical principles
Radin Dardashti, Enno Fischer, Robert Harlander

TL;DR
This paper introduces a 'life cycle' template for analyzing how scientific principles develop through stages like prehistory, elevation, formalization, generalization, and challenge, aiding understanding and assessment.
Contribution
It proposes a systematic template for characterizing the development of scientific principles and demonstrates its application to foundational physics examples.
Findings
The template effectively describes the development stages of scientific principles.
It can diagnose the quality of scientific principles.
It has implications for their empirical testability.
Abstract
Scientific principles can undergo various developments. While philosophers of science have acknowledged that such changes occur, there is no systematic account of the development of scientific principles. Here we propose a template for analyzing the development of scientific principles called the 'life cycle' of principles. It includes a series of processes that principles can go through: prehistory, elevation, formalization, generalization, and challenge. The life cycle, we argue, is a useful heuristic for the analysis of the development of scientific principles. We illustrate this by discussing examples from foundational physics including Lorentz invariance, Mach's principle, the naturalness principle, and the perfect cosmological principle. We also explore two applications of the template. First, we propose that the template can be employed to diagnose the quality of scientific…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInterdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
