Evaluating Multi-Sensor Placement and Neural Network Architectures for Physical Activity Level Classification
Bo Cui, Xiaowen Song, Tabak Monique, Bert-Jan van Beijnum, Ying, Wang

TL;DR
This study evaluates how sensor placement and neural network architectures affect physical activity level classification accuracy, finding that multi-sensor setups and CNN-LSTM models significantly improve performance for health monitoring.
Contribution
It systematically compares sensor placements and deep learning models, identifying optimal configurations for accurate physical activity classification.
Findings
Adding ankle sensors greatly improves activity classification accuracy.
CNN-LSTM models outperform other neural network architectures.
Multi-sensor setups are statistically more effective than single sensors.
Abstract
Accurate physical activity level (PAL) classification could be beneficial for osteoarthritis (OA) management. This study examines the impact of sensor placement and deep learning models on AL classification using the Metabolic Equivalent of Task values. The results show that the addition of anankle sensor (WA) significantly improves the classification of intensity activities compared to wrist-only configuration(53% to 86.2%). The CNN-LSTM model achieves the highest accuracy (95.09%). Statistical analysis confirms multi-sensor setups outperform single-sensor configurations (p < 0.05). The WA configuration offers a balance between usability and accuracy, making it a cost-effective solution for AL monitoring, particularly in OA management.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
