Do Short GRBs Exhibit an Anticorrelation between Their Intrinsic Duration and Redshift?
Ali M. Hasan, Walid J. Azzam

TL;DR
This study investigates whether an anticorrelation between intrinsic duration and redshift exists in short and long gamma-ray bursts, confirming it for long GRBs but not for short GRBs, with implications for progenitor models.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of the intrinsic duration-redshift relationship for both short and long GRBs using expanded datasets, clarifying their differing behaviors.
Findings
Long GRBs show an anticorrelation between intrinsic duration and redshift.
Short GRBs do not exhibit an anticorrelation.
Results suggest different progenitor evolution for short and long GRBs.
Abstract
Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are violent stellar explosions that are traditionally divided into two groups: short bursts (SGRBs) with an observed duration T90 < 2 s, and long bursts (LGRBs) with an observed duration T90 > 2 s, where T90 refers to the time needed for 90% of the fluence to be detected. Studies of progenitor models suggest that LGRBs emanate from the core collapse of massive stars, while SGRBs result from the merging of two compact objects, like two neutron stars or a neutron star and a black hole. Recent studies have found evidence that there is an anticorrelation between the intrinsic duration and the redshift of long GRBs. In this study, we first check whether LGRBs exhibit an anticorrelation between their intrinsic duration and redshift using an expanded dataset of long bursts that we have compiled. Next, we investigate whether this anticorrelation applies to SGRBs as well…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
