EyeBench: A Call for More Rigorous Evaluation of Retinal Image Enhancement

TL;DR

EyeBench is a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate retinal image enhancement models by aligning them with clinical needs, incorporating expert assessments and multiple downstream tasks for more meaningful evaluation.

Contribution

The paper introduces EyeBench, a novel evaluation framework that combines clinical relevance, expert-guided protocols, and multi-task assessments for retinal image enhancement models.

Findings

Existing models show varied performance across downstream tasks.

Expert evaluations reveal strengths and weaknesses of current methods.

The benchmark highlights challenges faced by current retinal enhancement techniques.

Abstract

Over the past decade, generative models have achieved significant success in enhancement fundus images.However, the evaluation of these models still presents a considerable challenge. A comprehensive evaluation benchmark for fundus image enhancement is indispensable for three main reasons: 1) The existing denoising metrics (e.g., PSNR, SSIM) are hardly to extend to downstream real-world clinical research (e.g., Vessel morphology consistency). 2) There is a lack of comprehensive evaluation for both paired and unpaired enhancement methods, along with the need for expert protocols to accurately assess clinical value. 3) An ideal evaluation system should provide insights to inform future developments of fundus image enhancement. To this end, we propose a novel comprehensive benchmark, EyeBench, to provide insights that align enhancement models with clinical needs, offering a foundation for future work to improve the clinical relevance and applicability of generative models for fundus image enhancement. EyeBench has three appealing properties: 1) multi-dimensional clinical alignment downstream evaluation: In addition to evaluating the enhancement task, we provide several clinically significant downstream tasks for fundus images, including vessel segmentation, DR grading, denoising generalization, and lesion segmentation. 2) Medical expert-guided evaluation design: We introduce a novel dataset that promote comprehensive and fair comparisons between paired and unpaired methods and includes a manual evaluation protocol by medical experts. 3) Valuable insights: Our benchmark study provides a comprehensive and rigorous evaluation of existing methods across different downstream tasks, assisting medical experts in making informed choices. Additionally, we offer further analysis of the challenges faced by existing methods. The code is available at \url{https://github.com/Retinal-Research/EyeBench}