Ordinality in Random Allocation
Eun Jeong Heo, Vikram Manjunath

TL;DR
This paper explores the role of ordinal rules in lottery-based allocations, showing that certain desirable properties imply the use of ordinal methods in three-agent problems.
Contribution
It provides an axiomatic justification for ordinal rules in three-agent lottery allocations based on efficiency, strategy-proofness, non-bossiness, and continuity.
Findings
Ordinal rules are implied by key axioms in three-agent settings.
Efficiency and strategy-proofness together lead to ordinality.
The results justify the common use of ordinal rules under certain conditions.
Abstract
In allocating objects via lotteries, it is common to consider ordinal rules that rely solely on how agents rank degenerate lotteries. While ordinality is often imposed due to cognitive or informational constraints, we provide another justification from an axiomatic perspective: for three-agent problems, the combination of efficiency, strategy-proofness, non-bossiness, and a weak form of continuity collectively implies ordinality.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems
