Thermodynamic closure of quantum measurements and the limits of the indirect measurement model
M. Hamed Mohammady, Francesco Buscemi

TL;DR
This paper explores the thermodynamic implications of quantum measurements, revealing a fundamental tension between thermodynamic consistency and the universal applicability of the indirect measurement model.
Contribution
It distinguishes two levels of thermodynamic closure in quantum measurements and shows that efficient measurements cannot be thermodynamically closed at the measurement process level.
Findings
Unitary dilations do not generally provide thermodynamic closure.
Efficient measurements are compatible with thermodynamics at the instrument level.
Efficient measurements are forbidden at the measurement process level for thermodynamic closure.
Abstract
We investigate the consequences of requiring that a quantum measurement admit an adiabatic enclosure, so that it can be assigned a genuine thermodynamic description in which energy exchange is meaningfully resolved into work and heat. We identify two inequivalent levels at which such thermodynamic closure can be imposed: at the level of the measurement instrument acting on the system, or at the level of the indirect measurement process realising the instrument, namely the interaction between the system and a measuring apparatus, possibly including arbitrarily large environments. Although every instrument admits a unitary dilation, we show that such a construction does not generally provide an admissible thermodynamic closure. This distinction is especially dramatic for efficient measurements, i.e., measurements that are completely purity-preserving and described by a single Kraus…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
