Improving LLM-powered Recommendations with Personalized Information
Jiahao Liu, Xueshuo Yan, Dongsheng Li, Guangping Zhang, Hansu Gu, Peng, Zhang, Tun Lu, Li Shang, Ning Gu

TL;DR
This paper introduces CoT-Rec, a pipeline that enhances LLM-powered recommendations by integrating personalized user preferences and item perceptions through Chain-of-Thought processes, improving reasoning capabilities.
Contribution
The paper proposes a novel two-stage pipeline, CoT-Rec, that incorporates personalized information extraction and utilization to improve LLM-based recommendation systems.
Findings
CoT-Rec improves recommendation quality in experiments.
The approach effectively leverages LLM reasoning capabilities.
Implementation is publicly available for reproducibility.
Abstract
Due to the lack of explicit reasoning modeling, existing LLM-powered recommendations fail to leverage LLMs' reasoning capabilities effectively. In this paper, we propose a pipeline called CoT-Rec, which integrates two key Chain-of-Thought (CoT) processes -- user preference analysis and item perception analysis -- into LLM-powered recommendations, thereby enhancing the utilization of LLMs' reasoning abilities. CoT-Rec consists of two stages: (1) personalized information extraction, where user preferences and item perception are extracted, and (2) personalized information utilization, where this information is incorporated into the LLM-powered recommendation process. Experimental results demonstrate that CoT-Rec shows potential for improving LLM-powered recommendations. The implementation is publicly available at https://github.com/jhliu0807/CoT-Rec.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSemantic Web and Ontologies · Business Process Modeling and Analysis · Artificial Intelligence in Law
