Simulating Cooperative Prosocial Behavior with Multi-Agent LLMs: Evidence and Mechanisms for AI Agents to Inform Policy Decisions
Karthik Sreedhar, Alice Cai, Jenny Ma, Jeffrey V. Nickerson, Lydia B., Chilton

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that multi-agent LLM systems can simulate human prosocial behaviors, replicate complex experimental treatments, and exhibit real-world actions like collaboration and cheating, aiding policy development.
Contribution
It shows that multi-agent LLMs can accurately replicate human prosocial behavior and complex experimental conditions, advancing their use in policy simulation and analysis.
Findings
Successfully replicated human behavior in public goods game experiments
Can simulate combined experimental treatments not previously studied
Exhibit real-world actions like collaboration and cheating
Abstract
Human prosocial cooperation is essential for our collective health, education, and welfare. However, designing social systems to maintain or incentivize prosocial behavior is challenging because people can act selfishly to maximize personal gain. This complex and unpredictable aspect of human behavior makes it difficult for policymakers to foresee the implications of their designs. Recently, multi-agent LLM systems have shown remarkable capabilities in simulating human-like behavior, and replicating some human lab experiments. This paper studies how well multi-agent systems can simulate prosocial human behavior, such as that seen in the public goods game (PGG), and whether multi-agent systems can exhibit ``unbounded actions'' seen outside the lab in real world scenarios. We find that multi-agent LLM systems successfully replicate human behavior from lab experiments of the public goods…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Law
