The Agafonov and Schnorr-Stimm theorems for probabilistic automata
Laurent Bienvenu, Hugo Gimbert, Subin Pulari

TL;DR
This paper extends classical automata-based characterizations of normal sequences to probabilistic automata, proving that normality is preserved under probabilistic automaton selection and betting strategies with probability 1.
Contribution
It proves the Agafonov and Schnorr-Stimm theorems for normal sequences hold for all probabilistic finite automata, generalizing prior deterministic results.
Findings
Normal sequences are preserved under probabilistic automaton selection with probability 1.
Probabilistic automaton betting strategies cannot win on normal sequences with probability 1.
Theorems hold for arbitrary probabilistic automata, not just rational transition probabilities.
Abstract
For a fixed alphabet , an infinite sequence is said to be normal if every word over appears in with the same frequency as any other word of the same length. A classical result of Agafonov (1966) relates normality to finite automata as follows: a sequence is normal if and only if any subsequence of selected by a finite automaton is itself normal. Another theorem of Schnorr and Stimm (1972) gives an alternative characterization: a sequence is normal if and only if no gambler can win large amounts of money by betting on the sequence using a strategy that can be described by a finite automaton. Both of these theorems are established in the setting of deterministic finite automata. This raises the question as to whether they can be extended to the setting of probabilistic finite automata. In the case of the Agafonov theorem, this question was positively…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
