On the Learnability of Knot Invariants: Representation, Predictability, and Neural Similarity
Audrey Lindsay, Fabian Ruehle

TL;DR
This paper investigates how neural networks predict knot invariants, examining the effects of different representations, the learnability of various invariants, and introducing methods to analyze neural similarity in topological predictions.
Contribution
It provides insights into the influence of knot representations on neural prediction accuracy, identifies which invariants are easier to learn, and introduces new similarity measures for neural network analysis.
Findings
Braid representations generally yield better predictions.
Hyperbolic geometry invariants are easier to learn than topological ones.
The Arf invariant remains difficult for neural networks to predict.
Abstract
We analyze different aspects of neural network predictions of knot invariants. First, we investigate the impact of different knot representations on the prediction of invariants and find that braid representations work in general the best. Second, we study which knot invariants are easy to learn, with invariants derived from hyperbolic geometry and knot diagrams being very easy to learn, while invariants derived from topological or homological data are harder. Predicting the Arf invariant could not be learned for any representation. Third, we propose a cosine similarity score based on gradient saliency vectors, and a joint misclassification score to uncover similarities in neural networks trained to predict related topological invariants.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeural Networks and Applications
