AI and the Law: Evaluating ChatGPT's Performance in Legal Classification
Pawel Weichbroth

TL;DR
This study evaluates ChatGPT's ability to classify legal cases under the Polish Penal Code, demonstrating high accuracy and appropriate legal reasoning, indicating its potential as a legal analysis tool.
Contribution
It is the first to assess ChatGPT's performance in Polish legal classification, showing its effectiveness in evidence analysis and legal reasoning.
Findings
Excellent binary classification accuracy for legal cases
Legal basis and content provided by ChatGPT were appropriate
Potential for ChatGPT to assist in legal evidence analysis
Abstract
The use of ChatGPT to analyze and classify evidence in criminal proceedings has been a topic of ongoing discussion. However, to the best of our knowledge, this issue has not been studied in the context of the Polish language. This study addresses this research gap by evaluating the effectiveness of ChatGPT in classifying legal cases under the Polish Penal Code. The results show excellent binary classification accuracy, with all positive and negative cases correctly categorized. In addition, a qualitative evaluation confirms that the legal basis provided for each case, along with the relevant legal content, was appropriate. The results obtained suggest that ChatGPT can effectively analyze and classify evidence while applying the appropriate legal rules. In conclusion, ChatGPT has the potential to assist interested parties in the analysis of evidence and serve as a valuable legal resource…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Law · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
