Defining and Evaluating Visual Language Models' Basic Spatial Abilities: A Perspective from Psychometrics
Wenrui Xu, Dalin Lyu, Weihang Wang, Jie Feng, Chen Gao, Yong Li

TL;DR
This paper introduces a psychometric framework for evaluating basic spatial abilities in Visual Language Models, benchmarking 13 models and revealing gaps compared to human spatial cognition, with implications for developing more embodied AI.
Contribution
It pioneers a psychometric approach to define and measure five basic spatial abilities in VLMs, providing a diagnostic toolkit and methodological foundation for spatial intelligence development.
Findings
VLMs show hierarchical spatial abilities similar to humans
Smaller models outperform larger ones in spatial tasks
Interventions like chain-of-thought improve VLM performance modestly
Abstract
The Theory of Multiple Intelligences underscores the hierarchical nature of cognitive capabilities. To advance Spatial Artificial Intelligence, we pioneer a psychometric framework defining five Basic Spatial Abilities (BSAs) in Visual Language Models (VLMs): Spatial Perception, Spatial Relation, Spatial Orientation, Mental Rotation, and Spatial Visualization. Benchmarking 13 mainstream VLMs through nine validated psychometric experiments reveals significant gaps versus humans (average score 24.95 vs. 68.38), with three key findings: 1) VLMs mirror human hierarchies (strongest in 2D orientation, weakest in 3D rotation) with independent BSAs (Pearson's r<0.4); 2) Smaller models such as Qwen2-VL-7B surpass larger counterparts, with Qwen leading (30.82) and InternVL2 lagging (19.6); 3) Interventions like chain-of-thought (0.100 accuracy gain) and 5-shot training (0.259 improvement) show…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsSpatial Cognition and Navigation
