TL;DR
This paper introduces a diagnostic tool to identify and address stochastic positivity violations in causal inference, especially with continuous treatments, aiding researchers in assessing and adjusting their estimands effectively.
Contribution
The paper proposes a novel diagnostic method to detect stochastic positivity issues and guide estimand modifications without requiring initial model estimation.
Findings
Diagnostic effectively identifies positivity violations.
Simulation shows how diagnostic informs bias expectations.
Application demonstrates practical utility in pharmacoepidemiology.
Abstract
The positivity assumption is central in the identification of a causal effect, and especially the stochastic variant is an issue many applied researchers face, yet is rarely discussed, especially in conjunction with continuous treatments or Modified Treatment Policies. One common recommendation for dealing with a violation is to change the estimand. However, an applied researcher is faced with two problems: First, how can she tell whether there is a stochastic positivity violation given her estimand of interest, preferably without having to estimate a model first? Second, if she finds a problem with stochastic positivity, how should she change her estimand in order to arrive at an estimand which does not face the same issues? We suggest a novel diagnostic which allows the researcher to answer both questions by providing insights into how well an estimation for a certain estimand can be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
