Automatic target validation based on neuroscientific literature mining for tractography
Xavier Vasques, Renaud Richardet, Sean L Hill, David Slater,, Jean-Cedric Chappelier, Etienne Pralong, Jocelyne Bloch, Bogdan Draganski,, Laura Cif

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that text-mining models can automatically identify brain connectivity targets from neuroscientific literature with high recall, significantly aiding tractography studies and reducing manual review effort.
Contribution
The paper introduces a novel application of text-mining models to automatically suggest brain targets for tractography, achieving high recall and efficiency compared to manual literature review.
Findings
Text-mining identified three times more targets than manual review.
Recall of 98% indicates high effectiveness of the method.
The approach is applicable across species, including humans.
Abstract
Target identification for tractography studies requires solid anatomical knowledge validated by an extensive literature review across species for each seed structure to be studied. Manual literature review to identify targets for a given seed region is tedious and potentially subjective. Therefore, complementary approaches would be useful. We propose to use text-mining models to automatically suggest potential targets from the neuroscientific literature, full-text articles and abstracts, so that they can be used for anatomical connection studies and more specifically for tractography. We applied text-mining models to three structures: two well-studied structures, since validated deep brain stimulation targets, the internal globus pallidus and the subthalamic nucleus and, the nucleus accumbens, an exploratory target for treating psychiatric disorders. We performed a systematic review of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
