Monotonicity and Bracketing in Games
Fedor Sandomirskiy, Po Hyun Sung, Omer Tamuz, Ben Wincelberg

TL;DR
This paper characterizes solution concepts like Nash and logit equilibria in normal-form games, incorporating non-expected utility and players' responsiveness to payoffs, with implications for simultaneous game play.
Contribution
It provides a unified axiomatic framework for Nash and logit equilibria, extending to non-expected utility scenarios and multiple simultaneous games.
Findings
Characterization of Nash equilibria
Extension to logit quantal response equilibria
Inclusion of non-expected utility considerations
Abstract
We study solution concepts for normal-form games. We obtain a characterization of Nash equilibria and logit quantal response equilibria, as well as generalizations capturing non-expected utility. Our axioms reflect that players are responsive to payoffs induced by the play of others and, whenever several games are played simultaneously, players may consider each separately.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Applications
