RAS: Retrieval-And-Structuring for Knowledge-Intensive LLM Generation
Pengcheng Jiang, Lang Cao, Ruike Zhu, Minhao Jiang, Yunyi Zhang, Jiaming Shen, Jimeng Sun, Jiawei Han

TL;DR
The paper introduces RAS, a framework that dynamically constructs question-specific knowledge graphs through iterative retrieval and structuring, significantly improving reasoning in large language models on knowledge-intensive tasks.
Contribution
RAS is a novel method that combines retrieval planning with incremental graph construction to enhance reasoning in LLMs by organizing retrieved information into structured knowledge graphs.
Findings
RAS outperforms baselines on seven benchmarks.
Achieves up to 8.7% and 7.0% improvements with different LLMs.
Dynamic structuring improves reasoning accuracy and robustness.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive performance on knowledge-intensive tasks, yet they often struggle with multi-step reasoning due to the unstructured nature of retrieved context. While retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods provide external information, the lack of explicit organization among retrieved passages limits their effectiveness, leading to brittle reasoning pathways. Recent interpretability studies highlighting the importance of structured intermediate reasoning further align with this perspective. We propose Retrieval-And-Structuring (RAS), a framework that dynamically constructs question-specific knowledge graphs through iterative retrieval and structured knowledge building. RAS interleaves targeted retrieval planning with incremental graph construction, enabling models to assemble and reason over evolving knowledge structures tailored to each…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Poster
1. The paper is easy to follow. 2. The studied problem is important. 3. The proposed method is evaluated on an extensive set of datasets.
1. Important related work is neglected. Constructing dynamic knowlege graph for sovling complex reasoning tasks in RAG is a well-studied area. Representative work, such as SG-Prompt, ERA-CoT, and KnowTrace, is not analyzed in the paper, especially KnowTrace. Compared with these existing work, the novelty and technical contribution are limited. 2. Important baselines are missing in the experiments. It is not clear the true performance of the proposed method among existing work.
+ The paper introduces RAS, a dynamic, query-specific knowledge graph construction framework that avoids inefficiencies of global KG indexing and eliminates costly offline graph building, achieving pay-per-query scalability. + The method is evaluated comprehensively on multiple datasets across both open-source and closed-source LLMs, demonstrating consistent and generalizable effectiveness. + The framework improves reasoning transparency and provides a structured way to bridge retrieval and reas
- The paper lacks concrete examples demonstrating how graph representations outperform plain text in enhancing reasoning accuracy. It remains unclear which aspects of reasoning (e.g., factual grounding, compositional reasoning, or logical chaining) benefit most from graph structuring. - Moreover, since RAS and RPG are trained on different datasets of different scales, and the appendix shows that training set size directly affects performance, the gains of RAS over RPG on open-source settings (in
1. I appreciate this paper for utilizing the graph form representing knowledge and an elegant workflow to address complex and knowledge-intensive tasks. 2. The experiments are solid across many classic knowledge-intensive tasks, and the improvement is good. 3. This framework is general for closed and open-source LLMs, where the code is open-source.
1. This paper lacks the motivation for why organizing context in a graph form improves the performance of RAG. 2. The involved benchmarks are outdated. There are many new graph-rag datasets for reasoning on domain knowledge. The results on such datasets are necessary to improve the quality. [1] GraphRAG-Bench: Challenging Domain-Specific Reasoning for Evaluating Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation [2] When to use Graphs in RAG: A Comprehensive Benchmark and Analysis for Graph Retrieval-Augme
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLibrary Science and Information Systems · Semantic Web and Ontologies
MethodsALIGN
