Accelerated co-design of robots through morphological pretraining
Luke Strgar, Sam Kriegman

TL;DR
This paper introduces a method for rapid robot co-design using morphological pretraining and differentiable simulation, enabling quick evaluation of design changes and maintaining diversity in evolved robot populations.
Contribution
The authors present a novel morphological pretraining approach that allows zero-shot evaluation of robot designs and improves co-evolution efficiency over traditional methods.
Findings
Pretrained controllers enable rapid assessment of non-differentiable design changes.
Zero-shot evolution produces diverse, high-performing robot designs.
Fine-tuning pretrained controllers enhances diversity and performance during evolution.
Abstract
The co-design of robot morphology and neural control typically requires using reinforcement learning to approximate a unique control policy gradient for each body plan, demanding massive amounts of training data to measure the performance of each design. Here we show that a universal, morphology-agnostic controller can be rapidly and directly obtained by gradient-based optimization through differentiable simulation. This process of morphological pretraining allows the designer to explore non-differentiable changes to a robot's physical layout (e.g. adding, removing and recombining discrete body parts) and immediately determine which revisions are beneficial and which are deleterious using the pretrained model. We term this process "zero-shot evolution" and compare it with the simultaneous co-optimization of a universal controller alongside an evolving design population. We find the…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Poster
- Interesting control problem, here a population of robots with different morphologies and configurations. Use of new technologies, such as differentiable simulators for fast design optimisation. - The investigated morphology space is very large and complex - this is a clear strenght of this paper! - Another particular strength of the paper is providing more insights into the general co-design problem with universal policies by providing deeper analysis. - The literature review and discussion of
- The method only considers one simulation environment. - In Figure 6, it would have been interesting to see the best performance from all morphologies used in the pretraining stage (ie the best out of 10 million). It's not clear to me whether a better design can be found than through this massive grid search. - An open question is also if the results can be translated to other robotics domains, or if no differentiable simulator is available. This could restrict the applicability of the methods
1. The identification of "diversity collapse" is a key intellectual contribution. It provides a formal explanation for a likely unstated observation in many prior co-design studies. 2. The scale of the experiments is impressive (e.g., pretraining on 10M+ morphologies, evolving populations of 8192 robots).
1. The authors proposed the concept of "morphological pretraining". But they actually used a differentiable simulator to pretrain a single controller. This is a little bit confusing. I thought they were going to pre-train a single morphological design like what PreCo (Wang et al. 2023) does. 2. The task (phototaxis/magnetotaxis) is a single, well-defined objective. While complex due to the rugged terrain, it does not require higher-level behaviors like object manipulation, multi-agent interacti
- The paper is clearly written and includes detailed descriptions of both the method and the experimental setup. The authors do a good job explaining their simulation and differentiable modeling pipeline, and the visuals and figures effectively communicate the core ideas and results. - The motivation for leveraging morphological pretraining is sound, and the idea of a universal differentiable controller that enables rapid design-space exploration is intuitively appealing. The experiments convinc
- Despite the paper’s technical completeness, it reads more as a comprehensive experiment report than as a research contribution with clear conceptual novelty. Most components (differentiable simulation, universal controllers, and evolutionary co-design) are existing ideas in the literature, and it remains unclear what fundamentally new insight or principle this work establishes beyond scaling up prior approaches. - The lack of comparison against existing co-design or differentiable evolution ba
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsModular Robots and Swarm Intelligence · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Design Education and Practice
