First measurement of 87Rb({\alpha}, xn) cross sections at weak r-process energies in supernova {\nu}-driven ejecta to investigate elemental abundances in low-metallicity stars
C. Foug\`eres, M. L. Avila, A. Psaltis, M. Anastasiou, S. Bae, L., Balliet, K. Bhatt, L. Dienis, H. Jayatissa, V. Karayonchev, P. Mohr, F., Montes, D. Neto, F. de Oliveira Santos, W.-J. Ong, K. E. Rehm, W. Reviol, D., Santiago-Gonzalez, N. Sensharma, R. S. Sidhu, I. A. Tolstukhin

TL;DR
This study reports the first measurement of 87Rb({}, xn) reaction cross sections at energies relevant to the weak r-process in supernova ejecta, aiming to improve nuclear physics inputs for stellar nucleosynthesis models.
Contribution
It provides the first experimental cross section data for 87Rb({}, xn) reactions at weak r-process energies, reducing uncertainties in nuclear reaction rates used in astrophysical models.
Findings
Measured cross sections agree with statistical model estimates using Atomki-V2 -OMP.
Re-evaluated reaction rates were incorporated into nucleosynthesis calculations.
Conditions in -driven ejecta still fail to reproduce observed elemental abundances.
Abstract
Observed abundances of Z ~ 40 elements in metal-poor stars vary from star to star, indicating that the rapid and slow neutron capture processes may not contribute alone to the synthesis of elements beyond iron. The weak r-process was proposed to produce Z ~ 40 elements in a subset of old stars. Thought to occur in the {\nu}-driven ejecta of a core-collapse supernova, ({\alpha}, xn) reactions would drive the nuclear flow toward heavier masses at T = 2-5 GK. However, current comparisons between modelled and observed yields do not bring satisfactory insights into the stellar environment, mainly due to the uncertainties of the nuclear physics inputs where the dispersion in a given reaction rate often exceeds one order of magnitude. Involved rates are calculated with the statistical model where the choice of an {\alpha}-optical-model potential ({\alpha}OMP) leads to such a poor precision.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
