Structuring the Environment Nudges Participants Toward Hierarchical Over Shortest Path Planning

TL;DR

This study demonstrates how environmental structure influences human planning strategies, with structured environments nudging toward hierarchical plans and unstructured environments favoring shortest path strategies, revealing implicit decision-making processes.

Contribution

It provides empirical evidence that environmental cues can subtly guide planning strategy choices, highlighting the role of structure in decision-making.

Findings

Structured environments promote hierarchical planning.

Unstructured environments favor shortest path planning.

Participants often use implicit strategies unaware to themselves.

Abstract

Effective planning is crucial for navigating complex environments and achieving goals efficiently. In this study, we investigated how environmental structure influences the selection of planning strategies. Forty-two participants navigated a space station to collect colored spheres, with environments either structured (spheres grouped by color) or unstructured (spheres scattered randomly). We tested three types of plans: hierarchical (grouping spheres by color), shortest path (minimizing travel distance), and neutral (none of the above). By manipulating environmental structure, we were able to nudge participants toward a preference for hierarchical planning in structured environments, while shortest path plans were favored in unstructured environments. A mismatch between self-reported preferences and actual choices indicated that participants often adopted implicit strategies, unaware of their decision-making processes. These findings highlight the powerful effect of environmental cues on planning and suggest that even subtle changes in structure can guide the selection of planning strategies.