A Scoresheet for Explainable AI
Michael Winikoff, John Thangarajah, Sebastian Rodriguez

TL;DR
This paper introduces a scoresheet framework to specify and assess explainability requirements in AI systems, addressing the gap between high-level standards and practical needs across various applications.
Contribution
It develops a versatile scoresheet for evaluating explainability tailored to stakeholder needs, applicable to multiagent systems and other AI technologies.
Findings
Scoresheet effectively captures explainability requirements.
Application examples demonstrate its versatility.
Guidance improves practical adoption.
Abstract
Explainability is important for the transparency of autonomous and intelligent systems and for helping to support the development of appropriate levels of trust. There has been considerable work on developing approaches for explaining systems and there are standards that specify requirements for transparency. However, there is a gap: the standards are too high-level and do not adequately specify requirements for explainability. This paper develops a scoresheet that can be used to specify explainability requirements or to assess the explainability aspects provided for particular applications. The scoresheet is developed by considering the requirements of a range of stakeholders and is applicable to Multiagent Systems as well as other AI technologies. We also provide guidance for how to use the scoresheet and illustrate its generality and usefulness by applying it to a range of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
