In-Silico Investigation of 3D Quantitative Angiography for Internal Carotid Aneurysms Using Biplane Imaging and 3D Vascular Geometry Constraints
Kyle A. Williams, Swetadri Vasan Setlur Nagesh, Daniel R. Bednarek,, Stephen Rudin, Ciprian N. Ionita

TL;DR
This study explores reconstructing 4D angiography from standard 2D clinical images to accurately assess 3D blood flow in carotid aneurysms, potentially enhancing neurovascular diagnostics.
Contribution
It introduces a novel method for recovering 3D quantitative angiography data from standard clinical imaging protocols using 4D reconstruction constrained by 3D geometry.
Findings
Reconstructed 4D angiography closely matched CFD ground truth with low MSE.
API metrics from reconstructed data accurately reflected true flow dynamics.
The approach enables 3D flow assessment using standard 2D imaging, improving clinical neurovascular analysis.
Abstract
Quantitative angiography (QA) in two dimensions has been instrumental in assessing neurovascular contrast flow patterns, aiding disease severity and treatment outcome evaluations. However, QA requires high spatio-temporal resolution, restricting its use to digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and is prone to errors in quantification of highly 3D flow patterns. This study examines whether 3D QA information can be recovered by reconstructing four-dimensional (4D) angiography using data from standard clinical imaging protocols. Patient-specific internal carotid aneurysm models were used to generate high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of contrast flow. The resulting 4D angiograms were used to simulate biplane DSA under clinical imaging protocols. 4D angiography was reconstructed from two views using back-projection constrained by an a priori 3D geometry.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
