The Science of Evaluating Foundation Models
Jiayi Yuan, Jiamu Zhang, Andrew Wen, Xia Hu

TL;DR
This paper proposes a structured framework and practical tools for evaluating large foundation models, addressing challenges of size, diversity of use cases, and ethical considerations in real-world applications.
Contribution
It introduces a formalized evaluation process, actionable tools, and a comprehensive survey of recent advancements in large language model evaluation.
Findings
Structured evaluation framework tailored to use-case contexts
Actionable checklists and templates for reproducible assessments
Survey of recent advancements emphasizing real-world applications
Abstract
The emergent phenomena of large foundation models have revolutionized natural language processing. However, evaluating these models presents significant challenges due to their size, capabilities, and deployment across diverse applications. Existing literature often focuses on individual aspects, such as benchmark performance or specific tasks, but fails to provide a cohesive process that integrates the nuances of diverse use cases with broader ethical and operational considerations. This work focuses on three key aspects: (1) Formalizing the Evaluation Process by providing a structured framework tailored to specific use-case contexts, (2) Offering Actionable Tools and Frameworks such as checklists and templates to ensure thorough, reproducible, and practical evaluations, and (3) Surveying Recent Work with a targeted review of advancements in LLM evaluation, emphasizing real-world…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEvaluation and Performance Assessment · Civil and Structural Engineering Research
