A systematic literature review on the application of analytical approaches and mathematical programming in public bus transit network design and operations planning: Part I

TL;DR

This systematic review analyzes the application of analytical approaches and mathematical programming in public bus transit network design and operations planning from 1968 to 2021, highlighting trends, methodologies, and research gaps.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive comparison and critical analysis of analytical and mathematical programming methods in PBTNDP&OP, identifying gaps and suggesting future research directions.

Findings

Analytical approaches and mathematical programming are both widely used in PBTNDP&OP.

The review highlights trends in publication volume, key journals, and influential authors.

Identifies advantages, disadvantages, and potential extensions for each methodology.

Abstract

The Public Bus Transit Network Design Problem and Operations Planning (PBTNDP&OP) remains a core research area within transportation, in particular, because of the emergence of new transit technologies and services. Analytical approaches and mathematical programming are the most commonly applied methodologies to study this problem. Many studies utilize either of these two methods, often viewed as competing due to the unique benefits each provides that the other does not. This two-part paper systematically reviews the application of analytical approaches and mathematical programming in PBTNDP&OP, analyzing publications from 1968 to 2021. It begins by comparing analytical methods and mathematical programming through various statistical analyses, including the number of published papers, the most active journals and authors, keyword frequencies, keyword co-occurrence maps, and co-authorship maps. Subsequent analysis of the identified papers includes examinations from multiple perspectives: the problems investigated, modeling methods used, decision variables considered, network structures, and key findings. This is followed by a critical review of selected papers. The paper concludes by discussing the advantages and disadvantages of each approach and suggests potential extensions for future research based on identified gaps in existing studies.