Network Goodness-of-Fit for the block-model family

TL;DR

This paper introduces a new, flexible Goodness-of-Fit metric called GoF-MSCORE for evaluating how well four popular network models fit real networks, demonstrating its effectiveness and advantages over existing methods.

Contribution

The paper develops a novel, parameter-free GoF metric for the broadest network model (DCMM) and extends it to other models, providing a unified, powerful evaluation tool.

Findings

GoF-MSCORE converges to N(0,1) under correct model assumptions.

DCMM fits well with most real networks tested.

Other models like SBM, DCBM, MMSBM often do not fit large networks well.

Abstract

The block-model family has four popular network models (SBM, DCBM, MMSBM, and DCMM). A fundamental problem is, how well each of these models fits with real networks. We propose GoF-MSCORE as a new Goodness-of-Fit (GoF) metric for DCMM (the broadest one among the four), with two main ideas. The first is to use cycle count statistics as a general recipe for GoF. The second is a novel network fitting scheme. GoF-MSCORE is a flexible GoF approach, and we further extend it to SBM, DCBM, and MMSBM. This gives rise to a series of GoF metrics covering each of the four models in the block-model family. We show that for each of the four models, if the assumed model is correct, then the corresponding GoF metric converges to $N(0, 1)$ as the network sizes diverge. We also analyze the powers and show that these metrics are optimal in many settings. In comparison, many other GoF ideas face challenges: they may lack a parameter-free limiting null, or are non-optimal in power, or face an analytical hurdle. Note that a parameter-free limiting null is especially desirable as many network models have a large number of unknown parameters. The limiting nulls of our GoF metrics are always $N(0,1)$, which are parameter-free as desired. For 12 frequently-used real networks, we use the proposed GoF metrics to show that DCMM fits well with almost all of them. We also show that SBM, DCBM, and MMSBM do not fit well with many of these networks, especially when the networks are relatively large. To complement with our study on GoF, we also show that the DCMM is nearly as broad as the rank-$K$ network model. Based on these results, we recommend the DCMM as a promising model for undirected networks.