Anytime-valid FDR control with the stopped e-BH procedure
Hongjian Wang, Sanjit Dandapanthula, Aaditya Ramdas

TL;DR
This paper investigates the conditions under which the stopped e-BH procedure maintains false discovery rate control in sequential hypothesis testing, highlighting the importance of causal assumptions for valid application.
Contribution
It identifies a causal condition ensuring local e-processes are also global, enabling valid FDR control with the stopped e-BH procedure in sequential analysis.
Findings
The stopped e-BH procedure controls FDR under independence.
A causal condition is necessary for FDR control in dependent streams.
Most practical scenarios, including genomics, satisfy the causal condition.
Abstract
The recent e-Benjamini-Hochberg (e-BH) procedure for multiple hypothesis testing is known to control the false discovery rate (FDR) under arbitrary dependence between the input e-values. This paper points out an important subtlety when applying the e-BH procedure with e-processes, which are sequential generalizations of e-values (where the data are observed sequentially). Since adaptively stopped e-processes are e-values, the e-BH procedure can be repeatedly applied at every time step, and one can continuously monitor the e-processes and the rejection sets obtained. One would hope that the "stopped e-BH procedure" (se-BH) has an FDR guarantee for the rejection set obtained at any stopping time. However, while this is true if the data in different streams are independent, it is not true in full generality, because each stopped e-process is an e-value only for stopping times in its own…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNuclear Materials and Properties
