Reasoning-as-Logic-Units: Scaling Test-Time Reasoning in Large Language Models Through Logic Unit Alignment
Cheryl Li, Tianyuan Xu, Yiwen Guo

TL;DR
This paper introduces RaLU, a framework that improves large language model reasoning by aligning logical units between generated programs and natural language descriptions, leading to better accuracy and interpretability.
Contribution
RaLU is a novel test-time scaling method that decomposes programs into units, iteratively refines them, and aligns logic with NL, addressing reasoning hallucinations in LLMs.
Findings
RaLU outperforms baselines in mathematical reasoning tasks.
RaLU improves accuracy in algorithmic reasoning benchmarks.
RaLU enhances interpretability of LLM reasoning processes.
Abstract
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has shown promise in enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by generating natural language (NL) rationales that lead to the final answer. However, it struggles with numerical computation, which has somehow led to the development of program-aided techniques. Despite their potential, a persistent challenge remains: inconsistencies between LLM-reported reasoning steps and the logic in generated programs, which we term ``reasoning hallucinations." This stems from the inherent ambiguities of NL and the statistical nature of LLMs, which often lack rigorous logical coherence. To address this challenge, we propose a novel test-time scaling framework, Reasoning-as-Logic-Units (RaLU), which constructs a more reliable reasoning path by aligning logical units between the generated program and their corresponding NL descriptions. By…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsNatural Language Processing Techniques · Semantic Web and Ontologies · Topic Modeling
