Approximating Human Strategic Reasoning with LLM-Enhanced Recursive Reasoners Leveraging Multi-agent Hypergames
Vince Trencsenyi, Agnieszka Mensfelt, Kostas Stathis

TL;DR
This paper presents a framework using large language models within multi-agent hypergames to simulate and evaluate sophisticated recursive reasoning, outperforming baseline models and approximating human strategic behavior.
Contribution
It introduces a novel multi-agent hypergame environment with LLM-based agents and a new semantic measure of reasoning, advancing the simulation of human-like strategic reasoning.
Findings
LLM-based agents outperform baseline models in recursive reasoning tasks.
Artificial reasoners better approximate human strategic behavior.
The framework demonstrates improved solution quality in game simulations.
Abstract
LLM-driven multi-agent-based simulations have been gaining traction with applications in game-theoretic and social simulations. While most implementations seek to exploit or evaluate LLM-agentic reasoning, they often do so with a weak notion of agency and simplified architectures. We implement a role-based multi-agent strategic interaction framework tailored to sophisticated recursive reasoners, providing the means for systematic in-depth development and evaluation of strategic reasoning. Our game environment is governed by the umpire responsible for facilitating games, from matchmaking through move validation to environment management. Players incorporate state-of-the-art LLMs in their decision mechanism, relying on a formal hypergame-based model of hierarchical beliefs. We use one-shot, 2-player beauty contests to evaluate the recursive reasoning capabilities of the latest LLMs,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
