Fragments of arithmetic and cyclic proofs
Lev D. Beklemishev, Daniyar S. Shamkanov, Ivan N. Smirnov

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new cyclic proof system for Peano arithmetic that simplifies proof analysis and automation, and can represent various subsystems with restricted induction.
Contribution
The paper proposes an alternative cyclic proof system for Peano arithmetic that is simpler and adaptable for proof analysis and automation, also representing subsystems as fragments.
Findings
The new system is simpler than existing cyclic proof systems.
It effectively models various subsystems of Peano arithmetic.
The system facilitates proof analysis and inductive proof automation.
Abstract
We present an alternative cyclic proof system for Peano arithmetic that could be simpler than the existing ones and well-adapted both for proof analysis and for automatizing inductive proof search. In addition, we will show how various traditional subsystems of Peano arithmetic defined by restricted forms of induction can be represented as fragments of the proposed system.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHistory and Theory of Mathematics
