Fractional Claims Trades and Donations in Financial Networks
Martin Hoefer, Lars Huth, Lisa Wilhelmi

TL;DR
This paper investigates fractional claims trading and donations in financial networks, demonstrating polynomial-time algorithms for optimal creditor-positive trades and highlighting computational hardness in more complex scenarios with default costs.
Contribution
It introduces a framework for fractional claims trading and donations, providing polynomial-time algorithms for optimal trades and analyzing computational hardness in networks with default costs.
Findings
Optimal creditor-positive trades can be computed in polynomial time.
In networks with default costs, trades that improve assets are NP-hard to compute.
Efficient algorithms exist for optimal donations to multiple banks in networks without default costs.
Abstract
Exploring measures to improve financial networks and mitigate systemic risks is an ongoing challenge. We study claims trading, a notion defined in Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. For a bank in distress and a trading partner , the latter is taking over some claims of and in return giving liquidity to . The idea is to rescue (or mitigate contagion effects from 's insolvency). We focus on the impact of trading claims fractionally, when and can agree to trade only part of a claim. In addition, we study donations, in which only provides liquidity to . They can be seen as special claims trades. When trading a single claim or making a single donation in networks without default cost, we show that it is impossible to strictly improve the assets of both banks and . Since the goal is to rescue in distress, we study creditor-positive trades,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBanking stability, regulation, efficiency
