Hyperbolic Integral Homology Spheres and Binary Icosahedral Representations
Maria Stuebner

TL;DR
This paper explores the representations of hyperbolic integral homology spheres into the binary icosahedral group, revealing that such manifolds have quotient dimensions only 2 or 3, with infinitely many examples for each case.
Contribution
It provides a geometric interpretation of $2I$ representations and classifies hyperbolic 3-manifolds by their quotient dimension, showing the existence of infinitely many manifolds in each class.
Findings
Hyperbolic 3-manifolds have quotient dimension 2 or 3.
Manifolds with no non-trivial $A_5$ representations have quotient dimension 3.
Infinite families of manifolds with quotient dimension 2 are constructed via Dehn surgery.
Abstract
This paper examines the representations of hyperbolic integral homology spheres into the binary icosahedral group . We specifically give a geometric meaning to representations by relating them to Larsen's notion of quotient dimension, which gives us a sense of the frequency of regular finite covers. Our main theorem shows that hyperbolic 3-manifolds can only have quotient dimension 2 or 3, and each case is obtained infinitely many times. More specifically, we show that those with no non-trivial representations have quotient dimension 3, and we find a family of hyperbolic 3-manifolds obtained by Dehn surgery on an infinite 2-bridge hyperbolic knot family with quotient dimension 2.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematics and Applications · Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation · Geometric and Algebraic Topology
