Data-aware Dynamic Execution of Irregular Workloads on Heterogeneous Systems

TL;DR

DyPe is a dynamic scheduling framework that automatically optimizes workload distribution on heterogeneous systems with accelerators, significantly improving performance and energy efficiency over static methods.

Contribution

It introduces DyPe, a novel data-aware, multi-objective scheduling approach that dynamically adapts to workload and system characteristics for heterogeneous accelerators.

Findings

DyPe finds optimal schedules in 89.5% of cases, outperforming static scheduling.

Average 1.53x throughput and 1.09x energy efficiency improvements.

Conventional static scheduling is optimal in only 15% of cases.

Abstract

Current approaches to scheduling workloads on heterogeneous systems with specialized accelerators often rely on manual partitioning, offloading tasks with specific compute patterns to accelerators. This method requires extensive experimentation and human effort to identify the tasks suitable for the accelerator. To solve this problem, we introduce DyPe, a scheduling framework tailored for heterogeneous systems with specialized accelerators. Our method automatically partitions, deploys, and reschedules execution when necessary by dynamically analyzing the characteristics of the input data and leveraging the interoperator parallelism among heterogeneous devices. DyPe navigates a multi-objective, multi-constraint design space that considers both system constraints and application requirements, which allows it to discover Pareto-optimal mapping configurations, improving the system's overall performance and effectively managing energy-performance trade-offs. To demonstrate the benefits of our approach on real hardware, we build a heterogeneous system of GPUs and FPGAs with peer-to-peer data transfers. The experiments show that conventional static scheduling is optimal for 13 out of 86 cases for different workloads and system settings while DyPe is adaptable and able to find the optimal schedule in 77 out of 86 cases, with an average of only 3.95% performance or energy efficiency loss in the sub-optimal cases. Performance evaluation of DyPe shows an average of 1.53x throughput and 1.09x energy efficiency improvement over the static schedule baseline and 1.44x throughput and 1.66x energy efficiency over the GPU-only baseline.