Hardness of Hypergraph Edge Modification Problems
Lior Gishboliner, Yevgeny Levanzov, Asaf Shapira

TL;DR
This paper proves that computing the maximum $F$-free subhypergraph size is NP-hard for non-$k$-partite hypergraphs, extending known graph results to hypergraphs and identifying cases where the problem is polynomial-time solvable.
Contribution
It extends NP-hardness results from graphs to hypergraphs for non-$k$-partite cases and introduces new techniques to handle the absence of Turán-type theorems in hypergraphs.
Findings
NP-hardness for non-$k$-partite hypergraphs
Polynomial-time solvability for matchings of fixed size
Development of new graph theoretic approach
Abstract
For a fixed graph , let denote the size of the largest -free subgraph of . Computing or estimating for various pairs is one of the central problems in extremal combinatorics. It is thus natural to ask how hard is it to compute this function. Motivated by an old problem of Yannakakis from the 80's, Alon, Shapira and Sudakov [ASS'09] proved that for every non-bipartite graph , computing is NP-hard. Addressing a conjecture of Ailon and Alon (2007), we prove a hypergraph analogue of this theorem, showing that for every and every non--partite -graph , computing is NP-hard. Furthermore, we conjecture that our hardness result can be extended to all -graphs other than a matching of fixed size. If true, this would give a precise characterization of the -graphs for which computing is NP-hard,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGraph Theory and Algorithms · Advanced Graph Theory Research · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
