Stateful Hash-Based Signature (SHBS) Benchmark Data for XMSS and LMS
Brian Romansky, Thomas Mazzuchi, Shahram Sarkani

TL;DR
This paper provides benchmark data for XMSS and LMS hash-based signature schemes to assist system designers in understanding their parameter trade-offs for quantum-resistant digital signatures.
Contribution
It offers comprehensive benchmark data for XMSS and LMS, aiding in selecting optimal parameters for long-term, quantum-resistant digital signature implementations.
Findings
Benchmark data for signature size and validation effort
Comparison of parameter impacts on security and performance
Guidance for system designers on configuration choices
Abstract
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has recommended the use of stateful hash-based digital signatures for long-term applications that may require protection from future threats that use quantum computers. XMSS and LMS, the two approved algorithms, have multiple parameter options that impact digital signature size, public key size, the number of signatures that can be produced over the life of a keypair, and the computational effort to validate signatures. This collection of benchmark data is intended to support system designers in understanding the differences among the configuration options.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
