Flow-based Conformal Prediction for Multi-dimensional Time Series
Junghwan Lee, Chen Xu, Yao Xie

TL;DR
This paper introduces a flow-based conformal prediction method for multi-dimensional time series that provides reliable uncertainty quantification and constructs smaller, accurate prediction sets while addressing key challenges in the field.
Contribution
It proposes a novel flow-based conformal prediction approach that leverages correlations and handles multi-dimensional outcomes, with theoretical guarantees and improved prediction set efficiency.
Findings
Constructs smaller prediction sets than existing methods
Maintains target coverage with finite-sample guarantees
Addresses key challenges in conformal prediction for time series
Abstract
Time series prediction underpins a broad range of downstream tasks across many scientific domains. Recent advances and increasing adoption of black-box machine learning models for time series prediction highlight the critical need for uncertainty quantification. While conformal prediction has gained attention as a reliable uncertainty quantification method, conformal prediction for time series faces two key challenges: (1) \textbf{leveraging correlations in observations and non-conformity scores to overcome the exchangeability assumption}, and (2) \textbf{constructing prediction sets for multi-dimensional outcomes}. To address these challenges, we propose a novel conformal prediction method for time series using flow with classifier-free guidance. We provide coverage guarantees by establishing exact non-asymptotic marginal coverage and a finite-sample bound on conditional coverage for…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2026 Poster
The experiments are conducted with multiple base predictors, and various baselines have been compared against, with FCP coming out as the best in the experiments. The experiments are repeated across several runs, providing uncertainty statements that give a better picture of the method's efficacy.
To best judge a conformal method, it is imperative to compare its performance across different significance levels, and plotting a calibration curve is particularly helpful. Most of the theoretical results are well-established or fundamental. See the "Questions" below for more.
1. The paper considers an important yet challenging problem: constructing calibrated prediction intervals for multivariate time-series data. 2. The proposed method has provided some fresh perspectives on the problem.
1. Although the goal is to construct prediction intervals, the proposed method does not seem to be a "conformal prediction" method in the usual sense: it does not leverage any (approximate) exchangeability of the conformity scores to determine the prediction region. Instead, it seems closer to a nonparametric method that directly models the residual distribution and then constructs prediction sets. 2. The theoretical guarantees are unclear. For marginal coverage, Proposition 4.6 states that t
(1) The paper features a clear structure and rigorous logic, facilitating readers' comprehensive understanding of the methodology. (2) The paper introduces a multidimensional uncertainty quantification approach centered on conditional continuous flow. By mapping source distributions to residual distributions, it establishes a unified pathway for constructing prediction sets, demonstrating novelty and general applicability. (3) The paper presents a comprehensive argumentative framework, rig
(1) The paper lacks a corresponding overview of methods and a concise algorithmic workflow. (2) The rationale for selecting the source distribution and scoring metric is not sufficiently discussed. The paper adopts an isotropic Gaussian distribution as its core design without presenting alternative source distributions or concluding on differences in coverage and set size. (3) The claim of conditional coverage lacks empirical support. While presented as a theoretical contribution, the expe
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTime Series Analysis and Forecasting · Neural Networks and Applications
MethodsAttention Is All You Need · Linear Layer · Multi-Head Attention · Dense Connections · Adam · Balanced Selection · Dropout · Layer Normalization · Position-Wise Feed-Forward Layer · Byte Pair Encoding
