Do Spikes Protect Privacy? Investigating Black-Box Model Inversion Attacks in Spiking Neural Networks
Hamed Poursiami, Ayana Moshruba, Maryam Parsa

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) offer inherent privacy protection against black-box Model Inversion attacks, finding that SNNs are more resistant than traditional ANNs due to their discrete, event-driven processing.
Contribution
First study to adapt and evaluate black-box MI attacks on SNNs, demonstrating their increased resistance compared to ANNs through a novel generative adversarial framework.
Findings
SNNs show significantly degraded attack reconstructions.
Increased instability in attack convergence on SNNs.
Overall reduced attack effectiveness on SNNs.
Abstract
As machine learning models become integral to security-sensitive applications, concerns over data leakage from adversarial attacks continue to rise. Model Inversion (MI) attacks pose a significant privacy threat by enabling adversaries to reconstruct training data from model outputs. While MI attacks on Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) have been widely studied, Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) remain largely unexplored in this context. Due to their event-driven and discrete computations, SNNs introduce fundamental differences in information processing that may offer inherent resistance to such attacks. A critical yet underexplored aspect of this threat lies in black-box settings, where attackers operate through queries without direct access to model parameters or gradients-representing a more realistic adversarial scenario in deployed systems. This work presents the first study of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsSpiking Neural Networks
