The Complexity of Blocking All Solutions
Christoph Gr\"une, Lasse Wulf

TL;DR
This paper proves that many fundamental interdiction problems, which involve blocking all solutions of combinatorial problems with few elements, are complete for the second level of the polynomial hierarchy, indicating they are even harder than NP-hard.
Contribution
It establishes $ ext{Sigma}_2^p$-completeness for a wide range of interdiction problems, extending previous frameworks and revealing their higher complexity class.
Findings
Many interdiction problems are $ ext{Sigma}_2^p$-complete.
The $ ext{Sigma}_2^p$-completeness applies to problems like SAT, dominating set, and TSP.
These problems cannot be modeled by compact integer programs unless NP equals $ ext{Sigma}_2^p$.
Abstract
We consider the general problem of blocking all solutions of some given combinatorial problem with only few elements. For example, the problem of destroying all maximum cliques of a given graph by forbidding only few vertices. Problems of this kind are so fundamental that they have been studied under many different names in many different disjoint research communities already since the 90s. Depending on the context, they have been called the interdiction, most vital vertex, most vital edge, blocker, or vertex deletion problem. Despite their apparent popularity, surprisingly little is known about the computational complexity of interdiction problems in the case where the original problem is already NP-complete. In this paper, we fill that gap of knowledge by showing that a large amount of interdiction problems are even harder than NP-hard. Namely, they are complete for the second stage…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms
