LLMs Can Teach Themselves to Better Predict the Future
Benjamin Turtel, Danny Franklin, and Philipp Schoenegger

TL;DR
This paper introduces a self-supervised fine-tuning method for large language models that improves their forecasting accuracy by using model-generated reasoning trajectories and outcome-based ranking, without human-labeled data.
Contribution
The authors develop an outcome-driven self-play framework combined with Direct Preference Optimization to enhance LLM forecasting abilities without human reasoning samples.
Findings
Increases prediction accuracy by 7-10% on test sets.
Achieves forecasting performance comparable to larger models like GPT-4o.
Does not rely on human-curated reasoning data.
Abstract
We present an outcome-driven fine-tuning framework that enhances the forecasting capabilities of large language models (LLMs) without relying on human-curated reasoning samples. Our method leverages model self-play to generate pairs of diverse reasoning trajectories and probabilistic forecasts for a set of diverse questions that resolve after the models' knowledge cutoff date. We then rank pairs of these reasoning traces by their distance to the actual outcomes before fine-tuning the model via Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). On a separate test set, our approach increases prediction accuracy of Phi-4 14B and DeepSeek-R1 14B by between 7--10\% over a base model and a DPO fine-tuned control model with randomized labels, bringing them on par with forecasting capabilities of much larger frontier models like GPT-4o.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsResearch Data Management Practices
MethodsDirect Preference Optimization · Balanced Selection · Sparse Evolutionary Training
