On Milnor's criterion for deciding whether a surface is hyperbolic or parabolic for biharmonic functions
John E. Bravo, Jean C. Cortissoz

TL;DR
This paper extends Milnor's classical result, which characterizes the nature of rotationally symmetric surfaces as parabolic or hyperbolic, to the broader context of biharmonic functions, providing new insights into surface classification.
Contribution
The paper generalizes Milnor's criterion from harmonic to biharmonic functions, offering a novel method to classify surfaces based on biharmonicity.
Findings
Extended Milnor's criterion to biharmonic functions
Provided new classification tools for surfaces
Enhanced understanding of surface geometry in biharmonic context
Abstract
In this paper we generalise a celebrated result of Milnor that characterises whether a rotationally symmetric surface is parabolic or hyperbolic to the case of biharmonic functions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric Analysis and Curvature Flows · Geometric and Algebraic Topology · Algebraic and Geometric Analysis
