Improving Language Models with Intentional Analysis

TL;DR

This paper introduces Intentional Analysis (IA), a novel method to incorporate intent-aware reasoning into language models, significantly enhancing their performance, robustness, and ability to address baseline weaknesses across various benchmarks.

Contribution

The paper presents IA, a new approach that explicitly models intent in language models, outperforming Chain-of-Thought and working synergistically with it, demonstrated on diverse benchmarks including proprietary models.

Findings

IA improves task performance across multiple benchmarks.

IA outperforms Chain-of-Thought reasoning in various settings.

IA enhances robustness and addresses baseline weaknesses like intent misunderstanding.

Abstract

Intent, a critical cognitive notion and mental state, is ubiquitous in human communication and problem-solving. Accurately understanding the underlying intent behind questions is imperative to reasoning towards correct answers. However, this significant concept has been largely disregarded in the rapid development of language models (LMs). To unleash the potential of intent and instill it into LMs, this paper introduces Intentional Analysis (IA), which explicitly invokes intent-aware analysis and reasoning during the problem-solving process. Comprehensive experiments across diverse benchmarks, model types, and configurations demonstrate the effectiveness, robustness, and generalizability of IA. Notably, IA consistently improves task performance even on SOTA proprietary models like GPT-5 and Claude-Opus-4.6. Moreover, IA not only outperforms Chain-of-Thought (CoT) across various experimental settings, but it can also synergistically work with CoT reasoning. Further qualitative analysis and case studies reveal that the benefits of IA stem from addressing several weaknesses in baseline methods, such as intent misunderstanding, hasty generalization, and mental laziness. Case studies also provide insights into the mechanisms underlying IA and clarify how it differs from CoT in mitigating these weaknesses. This study sheds light on a promising direction for the development of future LLMs with intentional analysis.