The Conundrum of Diffuse Basis Sets: A Blessing for Accuracy yet a Curse for Sparsity
Henryk Laqua, Linus Bjarne Dittmer, Martin Head-Gordon

TL;DR
Diffuse basis sets improve accuracy for non-covalent interactions but reduce the sparsity of the one-particle density matrix, a problem worsened by larger basis sets, which can be mitigated by using auxiliary basis set corrections.
Contribution
This paper identifies the basis set artifact causing low sparsity in the 1-PDM and proposes a correction method using auxiliary basis sets to improve sparsity and accuracy.
Findings
Low sparsity of 1-PDM is a basis set artifact.
Diffuse basis sets increase the decay rate of the 1-PDM.
Auxiliary basis set corrections improve non-covalent interaction calculations.
Abstract
Diffuse atomic orbital basis sets have proven to be essential to obtain accurate interaction energies, especially in regard to non-covalent interactions. However, they also have a detrimental impact on the sparsity of the one-particle density matrix (1-PDM), to a degree stronger than the spatial extent of the basis functions alone could explain. This is despite the fact that the matrix elements of the 1-PDM of insulators (systems with significant HOMO-LUMO gaps) are expected to decay exponentially with increasing real-space distance from the diagonal and the asymptotic decay rate is expected to have a well-defined basis set limit. The observed low sparsity of the 1-PDM appears to be independent of representation and even persists after projecting the 1-PDM onto a real-space grid, leading to the conclusion that this "curse of sparsity" is solely a basis set artifact, which,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
