Mitigating the Participation Bias by Balancing Extreme Ratings
Yongkang Guo, Yuqing Kong, and Jialiang Liu

TL;DR
This paper introduces novel aggregation methods to reduce participation bias in rating systems, effectively balancing extreme ratings and improving accuracy in both known and unknown sample size scenarios.
Contribution
The paper proposes two new robust aggregators, the Balanced Extremes Aggregator and the Polarizing-Averaging Aggregator, addressing participation bias in rating data.
Findings
Proposed aggregators outperform simple averaging and spectral methods.
Numerical results show improved bias mitigation.
Validated effectiveness on real-world data.
Abstract
Rating aggregation plays a crucial role in various fields, such as product recommendations, hotel rankings, and teaching evaluations. However, traditional averaging methods can be affected by participation bias, where some raters do not participate in the rating process, leading to potential distortions. In this paper, we consider a robust rating aggregation task under the participation bias. We assume that raters may not reveal their ratings with a certain probability depending on their individual ratings, resulting in partially observed samples. Our goal is to minimize the expected squared loss between the aggregated ratings and the average of all underlying ratings (possibly unobserved) in the worst-case scenario. We focus on two settings based on whether the sample size (i.e. the number of raters) is known. In the first setting, where the sample size is known, we propose an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications · Seismology and Earthquake Studies · Flood Risk Assessment and Management
MethodsFocus
