Training an LLM-as-a-Judge Model: Pipeline, Insights, and Practical Lessons
Renjun Hu, Yi Cheng, Libin Meng, Jiaxin Xia, Yi Zong, Xing Shi, Wei, Lin

TL;DR
This paper presents Themis, a fine-tuned LLM judge with a comprehensive development pipeline, novel evaluation methods, and insights into LLM-based judging, demonstrating high alignment with human preferences and practical guidelines for future work.
Contribution
Introduction of Themis, a flexible LLM judge with novel prompt and instruction generation techniques, along with benchmarks and insights into LLM evaluation performance.
Findings
Themis achieves high alignment with human preferences.
Pure knowledge distillation does not guarantee performance gains.
Instruction-following difficulty can mitigate scaling issues.
Abstract
The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has opened new possibilities for their adoption as evaluative judges. This paper introduces Themis, a fine-tuned LLM judge that delivers sophisticated context-aware evaluations. We provide a comprehensive overview of the development pipeline for Themis, highlighting its scenario-dependent evaluation prompts and two novel methods for controlled instruction generation. These designs enable Themis to effectively distill evaluative skills from teacher models, while retaining flexibility for continuous development. We introduce two human-labeled benchmarks for meta-evaluation, demonstrating that Themis can achieve high alignment with human preferences in an economical manner. Additionally, we explore insights into the LLM-as-a-judge paradigm, revealing nuances in performance and the varied effects of reference answers. Notably, we observe…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsKnowledge Distillation
