ReciNet: Reciprocal Space-Aware Long-Range Modeling for Crystalline Property Prediction
Jianan Nie, Peiyao Xiao, Kaiyi Ji, Peng Gao

TL;DR
ReciNet is a novel reciprocal space-aware neural network that effectively captures long-range interactions in crystal structures, achieving state-of-the-art accuracy in predicting various crystal properties.
Contribution
The paper introduces ReciNet, a new architecture leveraging reciprocal space Fourier representations to model long-range interactions in crystals, surpassing existing methods.
Findings
ReciNet achieves state-of-the-art accuracy on multiple crystal property benchmarks.
The reciprocal space approach effectively captures long-range interactions.
Multi-property prediction with mixture-of-experts is computationally efficient and beneficial.
Abstract
Predicting properties of crystals from their structures is a fundamental yet challenging task in materials science. Unlike molecules, crystal structures exhibit infinite periodic arrangements of atoms, requiring methods capable of capturing both local and global information effectively. However, current works fall short of capturing long-range interactions within periodic structures. To address this limitation, we leverage \emph{reciprocal space}, the natural domain for periodic crystals, and construct a Fourier series representation from fractional coordinates and reciprocal lattice vectors with learnable filters. Building on this principle, we introduce the reciprocal space-based geometry network (\textbf{ReciNet}), a novel architecture that integrates geometric GNNs and reciprocal blocks to model short-range and long-range interactions, respectively. Experimental results on standard…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
1. The key motivation in the problem —the locality bias of GNNs —is a well-known and significant barrier in the field. Its use of learnable filters (Eq. 9) is a significant step beyond models like PotNet, which rely on fixed, hand-crafted analytical functions (e.g., Ewald sums, Gaussian kernels). 2. Achieving SOTA on multiple properties across three standard, large-scale benchmarks (MP, JARVIS, MatBench) is a strong empirical validation. 3. The efficiency analysis (Table 5) is an important ad
1. The paper lacks physical insight or interpretability. This is the main concern. The paper only proves empirically that the learnable filter in Eq.(9) works, but it makes no attempt to explain why it works or what it has learned exactly. Without this analysis, the ReciprocalBlock remains a "black box." 2. The details regarding the ReciprocalBlock are not clear. For example, Eq.(8) computes a sum over $k_m$, which are described as "basis reciprocal lattice vectors". Do these $k_m$ mean only t
(1) The paper presents clear motivations, and this reviewer agrees on the importance of capturing long-range interactions. (2) The experiments are relatively comprehensive, covering diverse benchmarks and baselines, which effectively support the proposed approach. (3) The use of reciprocal space is well-motivated, as it naturally aligns with the periodic nature of crystal structures.
(1) A major concern lies in the relatively marginal improvement over baselines. As shown in Tables 1 and 2, ReciNet only slightly outperforms existing models, and the gain may not be statistically significant. In particular, the ablation study shows that with only three blocks, ReciNet underperforms baseline approaches in 3 out of 5 metrics on the Materials Project dataset, which weakens the claimed contribution of the long-range module. (2) If the main contribution is indeed the long-range int
1. A clear mechanism for long-range physics. ReciNet’s learnable ReciprocalBlock operates directly on fractional coordinates and reciprocal lattice vectors, preserving periodicity and space-group symmetries without supercells or fixed analytic kernels as a clean solution to long-range interactions. 2. Consistent SOTA across major benchmarks. It beats strong baselines on MP, on JARVIS, and leads MatBench (e_form and jdft2d). 3. The paper well explains why fixed, hand-crafted long-range potentials
1. Is the primary difference from EwaldMP the avoidance of k-space grid discretization? Please clarify how operating directly with reciprocal lattice vectors captures long-range information better than a grid-based approach theoretically or empirically. 2. The reported gains are modest but consistent; in my view, this does not diminish the significance of the authors’ contribution. Typos: 1. Line 124: Remove space before "," 2. Line 229: Incomplete sentence around "are" 3. Line 426: "crystal-n
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning in Materials Science
