Fully Autonomous AI Agents Should Not be Developed
Margaret Mitchell, Avijit Ghosh, Alexandra Sasha Luccioni, Giada Pistilli

TL;DR
This paper argues against the development of fully autonomous AI agents, highlighting increased safety and ethical risks as autonomy levels rise, and emphasizes the importance of cautious AI development.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of AI agent levels, ethical considerations, and trade-offs, emphasizing the risks associated with higher autonomy.
Findings
Risks to people increase with AI autonomy.
Safety risks are particularly concerning.
Higher autonomy leads to greater ethical trade-offs.
Abstract
This paper argues that fully autonomous AI agents should not be developed. In support of this position, we build from prior scientific literature and current product marketing to delineate different AI agent levels and detail the ethical values at play in each, documenting trade-offs in potential benefits and risks. Our analysis reveals that risks to people increase with the autonomy of a system: The more control a user cedes to an AI agent, the more risks to people arise. Particularly concerning are safety risks, which affect human life and impact further values.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAI-based Problem Solving and Planning · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
