Progressive Binarization with Semi-Structured Pruning for LLMs
Xianglong Yan, Tianao Zhang, Zhiteng Li, Haotong Qin, Yulun Zhang

TL;DR
This paper introduces PBS$^2$P, a novel framework combining progressive binarization and semi-structured pruning to effectively compress large language models while maintaining high performance.
Contribution
The paper proposes a new post-training compression method that jointly optimizes binarization and pruning, improving stability and accuracy over existing techniques.
Findings
Outperforms state-of-the-art binary quantization methods in perplexity.
Achieves higher downstream task accuracy.
Demonstrates effectiveness across multiple LLM families.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in natural language processing, but their high computational and memory costs hinder deployment on resource-constrained devices. Binarization represents the most extreme form of quantization, yet binarized models still contain redundancy that can be further removed. Pruning provides a natural way to eliminate such redundancy, but na\"ive combination with binarization often results in severe performance degradation. In this paper, we propose Progressive Binarization with Semi-Structured Pruning (PBSP), a novel post-training framework that seamlessly integrates binarization and semi-structured pruning. We first propose Stepwise semi-structured Pruning with Binarization Optimization (SPBO), which progressively introduces sparsity while optimizing binarization parameters to jointly reduce pruning and quantization error,…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2026
1. Method design shows some innovation: The paper jointly optimizes pruning and binarization, using a stepwise strategy to reduce the error accumulation from single-step pruning. 2. Comprehensive ablation studies: Experiments validate the contributions of the SPBO strategy as well as different metrics and pruning types to performance. 3. Clear presentation: The writing is well-structured, and the workflow and formulas are described in detail, making the approach easy to understand.
1. Limited innovation: Although the combination of stepwise pruning and quantization is experimentally validated, it essentially remains a combination of pruning and quantization, resulting in moderate to low novelty. 2. Hardware support limitations: The paper adopts 5:8 and 6:8 N:M sparsity configurations, but public documentation shows that NVIDIA GPUs only natively support 2:4 sparsity. Therefore, higher-ratio sparsity may not achieve hardware acceleration in practice. 3. Unclear hyperparamet
1. Well-motivated problem: Combining binarization with pruning to reduce redundancy and overcome performance degradation is a valuable research direction. 2. Comprehensive experiments: Extensive evaluation across multiple model families (LLaMA-1/2/3, OPT), datasets (perplexity and zero-shot), and model sizes demonstrates broad applicability. 3. Thorough ablations: Section 4.4 provides a good analysis of design choices (SPBO, search metrics, group size, etc.).
1. Certain techniques are not well explained, which may cause confusion and make reproduction difficult. See specific concerns in the Questions section below. 2. Computational cost: Inverting block wise covariances even at size 128 is not cheap; the fine stage dominates runtime (109 min on 7B). Complexity and wall-time scaling to 65B/70B should be analyzed more carefully (per-layer cost, number of SPBO alternations τ, M−N steps).
1. The paper is well-written. 2. The paper introduces PBS2P, a novel post-training framework that seamlessly integrates binarization (1-bit quantization) and semi-structured pruning (N:M sparsity), effectively reduces combined errors from pruning and quantization 3. Ablation tests validate each component (e.g., SPBO, CFS metrics, pruning types), highlighting their necessity and superiority, which strengthens the method's credibility.
1. The proposed method involves some predefined constants, such as N_high and N_low in CFS, and hyperparameters like Optimization Steps. It is unclear how to set the values of these predefined constants whether the settings of these constants affect the final compression effectiveness. (I am concerned that there may be difficulties or troubles in setting these constants during practical applications.) 2. The paper only tested zero-shot tasks on relatively old models, such as the Llama1 and Llama
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNatural Language Processing Techniques · Digital Rights Management and Security
MethodsPruning
