BrainOOD: Out-of-distribution Generalizable Brain Network Analysis
Jiaxing Xu, Yongqiang Chen, Xia Dong, Mengcheng Lan, Tiancheng Huang,, Qingtian Bian, James Cheng, Yiping Ke

TL;DR
BrainOOD is a novel framework that improves out-of-distribution generalization and interpretability of brain network analysis using GNNs, addressing challenges in neurological disorder detection across multi-site data.
Contribution
It introduces a tailored GNN framework with auxiliary losses and causal subgraph recovery for brain networks, enhancing OOD robustness and interpretability.
Findings
Outperforms 16 existing methods in OOD generalization
Improves OOD generalization by up to 8.5%
Provides scientifically valid interpretations of brain regions
Abstract
In neuroscience, identifying distinct patterns linked to neurological disorders, such as Alzheimer's and Autism, is critical for early diagnosis and effective intervention. Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have shown promising in analyzing brain networks, but there are two major challenges in using GNNs: (1) distribution shifts in multi-site brain network data, leading to poor Out-of-Distribution (OOD) generalization, and (2) limited interpretability in identifying key brain regions critical to neurological disorders. Existing graph OOD methods, while effective in other domains, struggle with the unique characteristics of brain networks. To bridge these gaps, we introduce BrainOOD, a novel framework tailored for brain networks that enhances GNNs' OOD generalization and interpretability. BrainOOD framework consists of a feature selector and a structure extractor, which incorporates various…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2025 Poster
- **Originality**: This paper demonstrates a notable level of novelty, particularly in its combined approach of selecting critical node features and graph structures, along with the batch-level loss designed to identify key discriminative connections. - **Quality**: The methodology is thoroughly evaluated through comparisons with 16 existing methods across two datasets (ABIDE and ADNI), effectively highlighting its effectiveness and efficiency. - **Significance**: This research provides valuable
- **Contribution of the Benchmark** **The claim of introducing the first benchmark seems somewhat overstated.** The ABIDE and ADNI datasets have been long established in brain network analysis and are widely used for evaluating brain disorder diagnosis models. Simply partitioning these datasets to create an OOD scenario may not constitute a significant contribution. - **Alignment of Motivation, Method, and Analysis** The motivation of this work is to address the OOD generalization problem. Ho
- The paper addresses a critical gap in brain network analysis by focusing on OOD generalization and interpretability, which are essential for deploying models in real-world settings. The work has high significance for the medical and neuroscience community. - It presents a framework that improves diagnostic tools for neurological disorders like AD and ASD, potentially leading to earlier and more accurate diagnoses. - The authors evaluate their method across two major datasets (ABIDE and ADNI)
1) The technical contribution of this paper appears to be marginal despite addressing the OOD generalization problem and enhancing interpretability in brain network analysis. While the introduction of an OOD benchmark for brain networks is appreciated, it is unclear if this benchmark adds novel challenges beyond those already present in multi-site datasets like ABIDE and ADNI. Furthermore, many of the technical components, such as the auxiliary losses and discrete sampling strategy, are borrowed
It is novel to simultaneously identify informative features and extract causal subgraph for brain functional network based prediction.
1. Several descriptions are not clear. Please refer to the Questions section for details. 2. The classification setting (6-class) on the ADNI dataset. It is confusing to have three classes related to MCI (MCI, EMCI, and LMCI), which affects the evaluation results. EMCI and LMCI are used in ANDI GO/2, while MCI used in ADNI 1 is deemed LMCI. A 5-class (CN, SMC, EMCI, LMCI, AD) setting is more reasonable.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
