Competition and survival in modern academia: A bibliometric case study of theoretical high-energy physics

TL;DR

This study analyzes the career longevity of theoretical high-energy physics researchers from 1950 to 2020, revealing increased dropout rates and highlighting the growing importance of early productivity and collaboration in academic survival.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of researcher career lengths and survival factors, employing a survival model to interpret trends over seven decades.

Findings

Dropout rates have increased significantly since the 1980s.

Early productivity and collaboration are key predictors of career survival.

The fraction of physicists with full careers has decreased over time.

Abstract

We study the career lengths of researchers in theoretical high-energy physics from 1950 to 2020. Using a cohort-based analysis and bibliometric data from 30,149 authors in three physics disciplines we observe a dramatic increase in the ratio of academic dropouts over time. Where nearly all authors prior to the 1980s remained active more than a decade after their initial publication, this was the case for 50% or less by the 2010s. Consequently, the fraction of theoretical physicists who achieve full academic careers have diminished significantly in the last four decades. Additionally, we study correlations between author survivability and potential success factors, inferring that early author productivity and collaborative efforts have become increasingly strong determinants over time. A logistic regression is utilized to interpret the empirical findings through a survival model. Performance measures further indicate that early career collaboration and productivity rates have emerged as reliable predictors of author survivability during the period in which competition has intensified. Finally, we discuss the potential impacts that these developments may have on science itself.