Tackling Feature and Sample Heterogeneity in Decentralized Multi-Task Learning: A Sheaf-Theoretic Approach
Chaouki Ben Issaid, Praneeth Vepakomma, Mehdi Bennis

TL;DR
This paper introduces a sheaf-theoretic framework for decentralized federated multi-task learning, effectively modeling complex client relationships and heterogeneity, while reducing communication costs.
Contribution
It proposes a novel sheaf-based approach and algorithm for FMTL that captures complex relationships and improves communication efficiency in decentralized settings.
Findings
Achieves sublinear convergence rate similar to existing algorithms.
Reduces communication overhead compared to baseline methods.
Effectively models heterogeneous client interactions using sheaf theory.
Abstract
Federated multi-task learning (FMTL) aims to simultaneously learn multiple related tasks across clients without sharing sensitive raw data. However, in the decentralized setting, existing FMTL frameworks are limited in their ability to capture complex task relationships and handle feature and sample heterogeneity across clients. To address these challenges, we introduce a novel sheaf-theoretic-based approach for FMTL. By representing client relationships using cellular sheaves, our framework can flexibly model interactions between heterogeneous client models. We formulate the sheaf-based FMTL optimization problem using sheaf Laplacian regularization and propose the Sheaf-FMTL algorithm to solve it. We show that the proposed framework provides a unified view encompassing many existing federated learning (FL) and FMTL approaches. Furthermore, we prove that our proposed algorithm,…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2025
Overall, this article gives an effective way to organize federated clients that achieves good inter-client information communication and could be a direction for federated learning training and development.
For the theoretical part, the objectives formulation of FMTL in existing scenarios should be clarified before elaborating the methodology Sheaf-FMTL. To support the claimed contribution that the Sheaf-FMTL design unifies PERSONALIZED FL, CONVENTIONAL FMTL, HYBRID FL, and CONVENTIONAL FL, more illustrations combined with formulas in addition to Remark 3.3 are supposed to provide. On the experimental side, I currently have the following questions and concerns, (1) the additional time-space costs
The topic is of great interest to the community. The introduction of sheaf Laplacian regulariztion to the objective function in FL is novel as it helps to model the interactions between heterogenous clients. This is meaningful when clients have different data distributions and/or model architectures.
The definition of federated multi-task learning (FMTL) is not clear across the manuscript and it seems that there exists disparity between what the authors claim it can do and what the method actually does in experiments. In the introduction, it is mentioned that "FMTL generalizes the FL framework by allowing the learning of multiple related tasks across several clients simultaneously." In the following texts, however, it seems that the setting is narrowed down to data/model-heterogeneous federa
The paper addresses federated multi-task learning, a growing area of interest due to its collaborative nature that enhances the effectiveness of the learning process.
Given that the proposed solution lacks theoretical guarantees on regret and that there are existing empirical approaches that effectively capture heterogeneous agents, its significance is somewhat limited. The paper also fails to provide a detailed comparison with benchmark approaches, despite the fact that federated multi-task learning has been extensively studied in the literature. The theoretical result on bounded gradient is not very significant under the assumptions on smoothness in the p
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFace and Expression Recognition
